|
Post by xxkingxx on Aug 25, 2007 22:11:00 GMT -5
alright to keep active I will call another open challenge so plez responed if you want to accept it and good luck
|
|
|
Post by Con Artist on Aug 28, 2007 10:26:47 GMT -5
i suggest bryan should accept this, and if nobody does i will accept. it's up to you if you compete with me a 2nd time.
|
|
|
Post by kwiatek on Sept 1, 2007 18:36:05 GMT -5
I will take it
|
|
|
Post by xxkingxx on Sept 1, 2007 19:10:53 GMT -5
alright cool now all we need is either Duke or Con to judge it and tell the rules
|
|
|
Post by kwiatek on Sept 6, 2007 20:45:50 GMT -5
Yea, as soon as they let us know what it is I'm in... even if I fail.
|
|
|
Post by Con Artist on Sept 9, 2007 15:14:07 GMT -5
due in 48 hours
style: tech color base: cool colors only (meaning green blue purple ect.) render: soldier size 130x350
go!
|
|
|
Post by xxkingxx on Sept 9, 2007 16:58:02 GMT -5
alright I got mine done and I hope I did it right lol so just tell me when you got yours kwiatek and we'll see who wins and good luck
|
|
|
Post by kwiatek on Sept 10, 2007 11:13:27 GMT -5
okay, I'm going to assume that the size for that is inverted due to the way it is meant to be written, if it isn't then I will make another that goes with the correct size, but as of yet I think I'm doing this properly.
|
|
|
Post by xxkingxx on Sept 10, 2007 19:05:24 GMT -5
Well I hope I did this right and I hope the render counts cause I thought it looked like a robot soldier and I wasn't familar to Tech brushes but hey always good to learn something new but anyways here it is
|
|
|
Post by kwiatek on Sept 11, 2007 10:54:33 GMT -5
crud, I didn't think he actually meant for it to look that way, because I recall seeing a topic about the way the values were reversed you defined the size online when compared to the way Photoshop requested they be put in. So if I did mine wrong let me know and if you give me some time to redo it I will fix it. and idk if those are truly tech brushes but these were the kinds of things I found when I searched for them, I found similar ones consistently so if this is wrong then idk what to do. Apologies all around
|
|
|
Post by xxkingxx on Sept 11, 2007 11:19:24 GMT -5
yea i was wondering the exact same thing lol so if I messed up is there any way I can get a little more time to make someting if not no probs
|
|
|
Post by kwiatek on Sept 11, 2007 12:21:07 GMT -5
I gotcha man, so if our judge would hurry up and let us know who needs to fix this issue that would be great. Anyway thanks for being understanding about the mess up king... I think you took the cake with this one. But that is fine, I haven't done very much that has been what you could call good when it comes to PS.
|
|
|
Post by Con Artist on Sept 11, 2007 19:28:39 GMT -5
style although kwiatek's BG is interesting and displays the tech style prominately, kings render was integrated perfectly into his BG. +2 king +1 kwiatek render kwiateks render was apropriate to the topic, but does not have much relation and/or integration to the sig as a whole. Kings render flowed and tied in well to his signature. +2 king +1 kwiatek text corect me if i am wrong but i dont think king has text on his sig... +2 kwiatek +0 king effects and color kwiatek used some blending ops wich added some depth and had some good color to color blending. king used a lense flare and had a consitant color base effecting his entire sig including his render. +2 king +1 kwiatek king=6 kwiatek=5 it was close but king left the winner. if you want to judge feal free but king was the oficial winner this time. if you were not satisfied or want doe redemtion feal free to challenge someone! you can challenge me if you want!
|
|
|
Post by CM Complexity on Sept 11, 2007 19:52:28 GMT -5
Damn King...just Damn
|
|